This adds Makefile/build-system support for USE_SYSTEMD=(yes|no|*). This
variable's value determines whether or not libsystemd will be linked at
build-time.
If USE_SYSTEMD is set to "yes", make will use PKG_CONFIG to check for
libsystemd's presence, and fail the build early if it isn't
installed/detected properly.
If USE_SYSTEM is set to "no", libsystemd will *not* be linked, even if
support for it is available on the system redis is being built on.
For any other value that USE_SYSTEM might assume (e.g. "auto"),
PKG_CONFIG will try to determine libsystemd's presence, and set up the
build process to link against it, if it was indicated as being
installed/available.
This approach has a number of repercussions of its own, most importantly
the following: If you build redis on a system that actually has systemd
support, but no libsystemd-dev package(s) installed, you'll end up
*without* support for systemd notification/status reporting support in
redis-server. This changes established runtime behaviour.
I'm not sure if the build system and/or the server binary should
indicate this. I'm also wondering if not actually having
systemd-notify-support, but requesting it via the server's config,
should result in a fatal error now.
Instead of replicating a subset of libsystemd's sd_notify(3) internally,
use the dynamic library provided by systemd to communicate with the
service manager.
When systemd supervision was auto-detected or configured, communicate
the actual server status (i.e. "Loading dataset", "Waiting for
master<->replica sync") to systemd, instead of declaring readiness right
after initializing the server process.
This is a light-weight replace function, useful for use cases such as
realloc()ing an existing value, etc. Using RM_ModuleTypeSetValue() in
such cases is wasteful and complex as it attempts to delete the old
value, call its destructor, etc.
Calling XADD with 0-0 or 0 would result in creating an
empty key and storing it in the database.
Even worse, because XADD will reply with error the action
will not be replicated, creating a master-replica
inconsistency
- Adding RM_ScanKey
- Adding tests for RM_ScanKey
- Refactoring RM_Scan API
Changes in RM_Scan
- cleanup in docs and coding convention
- Moving out of experimantal Api
- Adding ctx to scan callback
- Dont use cursor of -1 as an indication of done (can be a valid cursor)
- Set errno when returning 0 for various reasons
- Rename Cursor to ScanCursor
- Test filters key that are not strings, and opens a key if NULL
The implementation expose the following new functions:
1. RedisModule_CursorCreate - allow to create a new cursor object for
keys scanning
2. RedisModule_CursorRestart - restart an existing cursor to restart the
scan
3. RedisModule_CursorDestroy - destroy an existing cursor
4. RedisModule_Scan - scan keys
The RedisModule_Scan function gets a cursor object, a callback and void*
(used as user private data).
The callback will be called for each key in the database proving the key
name and the value as RedisModuleKey.
- the API name was odd, separated to two apis one for LRU and one for LFU
- the LRU idle time was in 1 second resolution, which might be ok for RDB
and RESTORE, but i think modules may need higher resolution
- adding tests for LFU and for handling maxmemory policy mismatch
recently added more reads into that function, if a later read fails, i must
either free what's already allocated, or return the pointer so that the free
callback will release it.