In addition to being more ergonomic these are much more efficient at reading
large files as they preallocate internally. This provides a nice speed boost
locally, reducing the overhead of `wasm-bindgen-test-runner` from 0.23s to
0.19s, yay!
This commit updates the test runner to only deserialize a `Module` once and then
directly pass it to the `wasm-bindgen` config, avoiding pulling in a public
dependency with the same strategy as the `wasm-gc-api` crate for now.
This reduces the runtime of this step for `wasm-bindgen-test-runner` from ~0.23s
to ~0.19s on my machine.
Since `wasmi` already has a public dependency on `parity_wasm` let's just use
it! A `clone` is much faster than a serialize + parse, reducing a `wasm-bindgen`
invocation on my machine from 0.2s to 0.18s.
Currently the `wasm-gc-api` crate doesn't expose `parity_wasm::Module` as a
public dependency which means that whenever we want to run a GC (which is twice
per `wasm-bindgen` invocation) we have to serialize and reparse the module a
lot! The `wasm-bindgen` has to serialize, `wasm-gc` then parses, `wasm-gc` then
serializes, and `wasm-bindgen` then parses.
This commit sidesteps all of these operations by ensuring that we always use the
same `parity_wasm::Module` instance, even when multiple versions of the
`parity_wasm` crate are in use. We'll get a speed boost when they happen to
align (which they always should for `wasm-bindgen`), but it'll work even if they
aren't aligned (by going through serialization).
Concretely on my machine this takes a `wasm-bindgen` invocation from 0.5s to
0.2s, a nice win!
This is a bit of a refinement of the solution from #548 to make sure that these
statics are only present on the `wasm32-*` targets, as otherwise these
descriptors are completely inert on other platforms!
It looks like these are primarily targeted at informing whether functionality is
either on web workers, windows, or both. For now we'll generate the same
bindings regardless, and users will need to be proactive about what they're
using. In that case there shouldn't be any need for us to process these, so
avoid warning about them!
