Reported in #1191 the fix requires us to get a bit creative I think. The
general gist is that a block like this:
#[wasm_bindgen]
impl Foo {
pub fn foo() {}
}
was previously expanded all in one go. Now, however, it's expanded into:
impl Foo {
#[__wasm_bindgen_class_marker(Foo = "Foo")]
pub fn foo() {}
}
// goop generated by orginal #[wasm_bindgen]
This method of expansion takes advantage of rustc's recursive expansion
feature. It also allows us to expand `impl` blocks and allow inner items
to not be fully expanded yet, such as still having `#[cfg]` attributes
(like in the original bug report).
We use theinternal `__wasm_bindgen_class_marker` to indicate that we're
parsing an `ImplItemMethod` unconditionally, and then generation
proceeds as usual. The only final catch is that when we're expanding in
an `impl` block we have to generate tokens for the `Program`
(wasm-bindgen injected goop like the custom section) inside the body
of the function itself instead of next to it. Otherwise we'd get syntax
errors inside of impl blocks!
Closes#1191
The bindings generation for a class would accidentally omit the `__wrap`
function if it was only discovered very late in the process that
`__wrap` was needed, after we'd already passed the point where we needed
to have decided that.
This commit moves struct field generation of bindings much earlier in
the binding generation process which should ensure everything is all
hooked up by the time we generate the classes themselves.
Closes#949
First added in #161 this never ended up panning out, so let's remove the
experimental suport which isn't actually used by anything today and hold off on
any other changes until an RFC happens.
