fluencelabs/redis
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fluencelabs/redis synced 2025-03-30 22:31:03 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

TODO updated

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
antirez 2011-07-27 16:39:03 +02:00
parent bb831c313c
commit 47cadab42b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 25 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
TODO
View File

@ -52,42 +52,18 @@ OPTIMIZATIONS
* Redis big lists as linked lists of small ziplists? * Redis big lists as linked lists of small ziplists?
Possibly a simple heuristic that join near nodes when some node gets smaller than the low_level, and split it into two if gets bigger than high_level. Possibly a simple heuristic that join near nodes when some node gets smaller than the low_level, and split it into two if gets bigger than high_level.
REPORTING
=========
* Better INFO output with sections.
RANDOM RANDOM
====== ======
* Server should abort when getcwd() fails if there is some kind of persistence configured. Check this in the cron loop.
* Clients should be closed as far as the output buffer list is bigger than a given number of elements (configurable in redis.conf) * Clients should be closed as far as the output buffer list is bigger than a given number of elements (configurable in redis.conf)
* Should the redis default configuration, and the default redis.conf, just bind 127.0.0.1? * Should the redis default configuration, and the default redis.conf, just bind 127.0.0.1?
KNOWN BUGS KNOWN BUGS
========== ==========
* What happens in the following scenario:
1) We are reading an AOF file.
2) SETEX FOO 5 BAR
3) APPEND FOO ZAP
What happens if between 1 and 2 for some reason (system under huge load
or alike) too many time passes? We should prevent expires while the
AOF is loading.
* #519: Slave may have expired keys that were never read in the master (so a DEL * #519: Slave may have expired keys that were never read in the master (so a DEL
is not sent in the replication channel) but are already expired since is not sent in the replication channel) but are already expired since
a lot of time. Maybe after a given delay that is undoubltly greater than a lot of time. Maybe after a given delay that is undoubltly greater than
the replication link latency we should expire this key on the slave on the replication link latency we should expire this key on the slave on
access? access?
DISKSTORE TODO
==============
* Fix FLUSHALL/FLUSHDB: the queue of pending reads/writes should be handled.
* Check that 00/00 and ff/ff exist at startup, otherwise exit with error.
* Implement sync flush option, where data is written synchronously on disk when a command is executed.
* Implement MULTI/EXEC as transaction abstract API to diskstore.c, with transaction_start, transaction_end, and a journal to recover.
* Stop BGSAVE thread on shutdown and any other condition where the child is killed during normal bgsave.
* Fix RANDOMKEY to really do something interesting
* Fix DBSIZE to really do something interesting
* Add a DEBUG command to check if an entry is or not in memory currently
* dscache.c near 236, kobj = createStringObject... we could use static obj.